Plan of the principal sites of the late Iron Age and Roman periods in
the Colchester area (drawn by Glenys Boyles; Colchester Museum)
Plan of the Roman colonia at Colchester showing the line of the Roman
fortress defences and location of principal buildings and other finds
(Colchester Archaeological Trust)
On approaching the Essex market town of Colchester by road,
you will be greeted at the town boundary by a sign which bears the words
`Welcome to Colchester- Britain's Oldest Recorded Town'. The visitor may,
however, be forgiven for asking what this town consisted of. To the classical
scholar the `-chester' element in the modern name, derived from the latin
castra, a camp, suggests a Roman origin, but virtually all that is recognisably
`historic' in Colchester is a few stretches of town wall and the Norman castle.
The disappearance of the tangible remains of Colchester's past is, of course,
largely due to the growth and accompanying rebuilding of the town in the
twentieth century, which has culminated in some major redevelopment projects in
the 1970s and 1980s. It was in advance of these redevelopments, however, that a
remarkable series of excavations made discoveries vital not only for
understanding Colchester's Roman past, but also the origins of urbanism in
Britain.
In essence Roman civilisation was an urban civilisation
based on a network of city states which acted as centres for all the economic,
political, social and religious life of their region. As we have already noted,
these cities were graded according to legal status and this in turn determined
the inhabitant's status, including tax liability and level of punishment in the
event of wrongdoing. Every town in the empire was, up to a point, organised
along the lines of Rome itself, with a town council, or ordo, nominally made up
of one hundred decuriones who qualified to serve on the basis of a property
qualification. They elected four magistrates annually, two to act as justices
and two to carry out public works. Although Rome itself did not have much of a
clear and ordered plan, provincial towns usually bore some resemblance to a
Roman ideal. The principal streets were laid out on a rectilinear grid pattern
which divided the urban area into what were known as insulae (islands). The
central insulae were occupied by the public buildings which included the forum,
essentially a large courtyard, often used as a market, which was enclosed on
three sides by shops or offices behind a colonnaded portico and on the fourth
by the basilica, a hall in which administrative and judicial business was
conducted. In adjacent insulae there would usually be a public bath house,
temple to the Roman gods and, on occasions, a theatre.
In Britain the Romans encountered a country without towns, a
country where the vast majority of the population lived in small villages or
isolated farmsteads. In order to conquer, govern and tax the Britons,
therefore, the Roman administration had to create towns. This involved
stimulating a taste for urban living, and a willingness on the part of the
leaders of native British society to adopt the Roman custom of paying for
public works as a way of expressing their social status. A reference to the
problem of changing the life-style of the native Britons is specifically made
by Tacitus in a well-known passage in his biography of Agricola, Governor of
Britain from AD 78 to 84:
Agricola had to deal with people living in isolation and
ignorance, and therefore prone to fight; and his object was to accustom them to
a life of peace and quiet by the provision of amenities. He therefore gave
private encouragement and official assistance to the building of temples, public
squares, and good houses.
In the light of this passage it is, perhaps, no accident
that one of the earliest mosaics in the palace at Fishbourne, near Chichester,
probably built to ensure the loyalty of a native British king, is a simplified
representation of a Roman town with walls, gates and a street grid. It is, to a
great extent, by the success of urbanisation that we may measure the success of
the Roman conquest of Britain.
Armed with this yardstick, we may now ask why the Romans
chose to start at Colchester. The answer is that one of the principal centres
of British resistance to the Roman invasion in AD 43 was a site at Gosbecks,
now on the south-western outskirts of the modern town. This was the
headquarters of the Trinovantes, one of the dominant peoples of south-eastern
England in the early first century AD. They were ruled in 43 by the sons of
King Cunobelin who had been leader of the Catuvellauni, another important tribe
with a base at Verulamium. All that survives above ground today of the native
capital at Colchester is a series of prominent linear earthworks, or dykes, and
a burial mound known as the Lexden tumulus. These sites have been the subject
of considerable speculation since at least the eighteenth century, and in 1759
they were drawn and mapped by the famous antiquary William Stukeley, inventor
of druidic mythology, who also suggested that The Mount, a surviving Roman
burial mound, was Cunobelin's grave
No comments:
Post a Comment